I'm
recovering nicely, thanks for asking.
But
I'm still doing the rest of these movies.
Before I forget, Happy (Slightly Belated) Canada Day to my Canadian readers and Happy Independence Day to the Americans!
23.
The Rescuers (1977)
Location:
New Orleans Square
It
takes place mostly in the Louisiana bayou and involves a search for
pirate treasure. That's pretty much a slam-dunk in favor of New
Orleans Square if you ask me. It's not the best movie for
attraction-ifying in the first place, but at least there's a
surprisingly good place to put it.
24.
The Fox and the Hound (1981)
Location:
Grizzly Peak?
I may end up catching flak for this, but my opinion of this film can
be summed up as “Bambi, if Bambi were a fox, and also the
movie sucked.” You can tell it's going for the same vibe, but
there's just no substance and no guts. I literally can't think of
anything about it to base an attraction on, even if they
wanted to. But I guess if they came up with something, it would best
go in Grizzly Peak, the same as Bambi.
25.
The Black Cauldron (1985)
Location:
Fantasyland
And the less said about this movie, the better, but you can't
deny it's a definite match for an area theme. It does have a much
darker aesthetic than Fantasyland as we know it, though...which is
giving me an idea for a possible future post!
26.
The Great Mouse Detective (1986)
Location:
Fantasyland?
I'm
torn here. On the one hand, the movie is
based on an English children's storybook. If Alice and Peter Pan and
Mr. Toad all get to be Fantasyland rides, why not this? But on the
other hand...it's not really a fantasy. It has its elements of
whimsy, to be sure—not least the fact that the characters are
mice—but apart from that, it has a weight of realism that isn't
present with the stories you usually expect to see replicated in ride
form in Fantasyland. There's no magic, no Otherworlds, no toys coming
to life. If they weren't
mice, there would be little to distinguish this from one of the
Sherlock Holmes stories which originally inspired it, though maybe
with the grittier elements toned down. I can't say where it would
work, if not Fantasyland, but it would be one of the odder choices.
27.
Oliver & Company (1988)
Location:
???
This one has me completely stumped. It's another “classic English
lit with animals” movie, so you'd think Fantasyland would be the
place for it, but they changed the setting from Victorian England to
1980s New York City.* I'm not sure there's anywhere in the
Disney theme parks that can support a setting like that. The American
Adventure (Epcot) is too history-focused. Disney-MGM
Disney-Hollywood Studios used to have a New York Street, but it got
changed to Streets of America at some point and I think it might be
something else again now? Anyway, I don't know how much New Yorkiness
survives.
If only Animal Kingdom had an
area focusing on pets and domestic animals. There is so
much Disney material
that would have a perfect home there.
28.
The Little Mermaid (1989)
Location:
Fantasyland/Paradise Pier
This
Very Important Film clearly belongs in Fantasyland, and Disney knows
it. It took them a while to add an Ariel “attraction”** to
Disneyland, but when they did, they had the sense to put on a patch
of real estate that was counted as part of Fantasyland. Where else
would you put something like that?
Apparently...Paradise
Pier. Because ocean. I understand that it fits the 1890s seaside
amusement park atmosphere to have mermaids (and mermen) as design
motifs, but it rather defeats the purpose to make them recognizable
animated characters. The
Little Mermaid
is perhaps the most apt movie of the Disney Renaissance for a dark
ride treatment and I'm glad it finally got one...but they really
should have found room for it in Fantasyland.
29. The Rescuers Down Under (1990)
Location:
Adventureland
I know, right? Australia isn't the sort of place usually associated
with Adventureland, but especially in the context of this movie, it
definitely works—wild and remote and bursting at the seams with
exotic animals. I would be all over a ride that was about
combing the Outback in search of Marahute, who is the sort of cryptid
we need more of in modern folklore: breathtaking and inspiring and
beautiful.
30.
Beauty and the Beast (1991)
Location:
Fantasyland
Ho-hum.
Another Princess fairy tale, another Fantasyland movie. Don't get me
wrong, this is an awesome movie—maybe the objectively best one in
the entire Disney Animated Canon to date—but there's really not
much to say about its best placement for theming, is there? It's too
obvious.
31.
Aladdin (1992)
Location:
Adventureland/Fantasyland
The
official big Aladdin...uh,
installation? Aladdin's Oasis isn't exactly an attraction and isn't
even used as a restaurant anymore...is in Adventureland, and it works
well enough because pseudo-Arabia is an exotic setting to American
eyes. And there was precedent—the fortunetelling lamp in the
Adventureland Bazaar pre-dates the film, which is why it's “Aladdin's
(Other) Lamp” and looks so different from the one in the movie. It
was just “Aladdin's Lamp” until there was a more iconic one to
compare it to.
But!
There are also some elaborate Aladdin
set pieces in Storybook Land, and while they look a little odd
compared to the other villages, they're not inherently ridiculous.
The story does qualify as a fairy tale, just not a European one. I
could go either way on this one.
32.
The Lion King (1994)
Location:
Adventureland
This
movie, on the other hand, is definitely best suited to Adventureland.
It's about megafauna of the African wilderness, which puts it pretty
close to being Adventureland: the Movie
(no, not that one)
to begin with.
33.
Pocahontas (1995)
Location:
Frontierland
This one seems fairly obvious on the surface, but it's an inexact
fit. Frontierland is set in the Westward Expansion period of American
history, with the United States already firmly established, while
Pocahontas is set near the beginning of British colonization
of North America. But it's got Indians and there are precious few
movies in this lineup that really work well with Frontierland, so
Frontierland it is.
We're well into what I consider the “current epoch” of Disney
animation at this point. Right around the release of Pocahontas,
two things happened. First, Pixar entered the field of theatrical
animation and immediately enjoyed success far beyond what Disney was
getting with traditional animation at the time. This threw the older
studio into what you might call a crisis of confidence, although it
took a few more years to get to the end of their production cycles so
that the crisis began to show. Secondly, control of Disneyland was
handed over to Paul “Let's Make Everything a Disney Store”
Pressler, and innovation at the park took a nosedive.
It's gonna be a rough couple of weeks...
* And
it was oh-so-hip at the time, but jeezum crow, this thing looks dated
nowadays.
** I
dunno. Do permanent themed meet-and-greet areas count as attractions?
Should they?
The Little Mermaid facade in Disneyland looks FANTASTIC, but yes, it is an ill-fit for that park. Magic Kingdom nailed it by putting it in New Fantasyland and giving it a wonderful queue that makes for a much fuller experience (it's weird what a good queue can do). The Beauty and the Beast section next door was also a stroke of genius. Considering that the movie isn't action packed enough to make a decent ride, the combination of restaurant, intimate theatrical performance, and village is excellent. Of course, the way the did the Little Mermaid ride it doesn't have much going for it either... It would have been better to have Ursula trying to steal the guests' voices instead of just watching the abridged version of the movie... But anyways...
ReplyDeleteAladdin's presence in Adventureland is much more keenly felt in Disneyland Paris, where the entrance to their Adventureland off the hub is Arabian/Moroccan in design and houses an Aladdin walkthrough. And really, it's one of the only animated films that does fit distinctly in with Adventureland. Jungle Book and Lion King do as well, but in way that you can point at them and draw direct correlations. Adventureland is really more steeped in Disney's live-action films, namely Swiss Family Robinson, Treasure Island, and the True Life Adventure films (not to mention Indiana Jones and African Queen, which aren't even Disney movies).
And yeah, now that you mention it, Rescuers does take place in the bayou, doesn't it? Huh...
If the TLM ride just gave us more of a sense of presence within each scene, it would be an improvement. But it all feels so spectator-y.
DeleteAladdin works in Adventureland by dint of the "exotic location" rules, but I feel the placement of Aladdin's Oasis in particular is kind of odd. I know they had to put it there because they were re-skinning an existing building, but being between the Tiki Room and Jungle Cruise makes the facades go Rainforest--Desert--Rainforest and it's jarring. This is what inspired my Adventureland Amphitheatre way back when, especially since the Oasis is hardly even used anymore.