I keep saying that having a popular IP tie-in isn’t
enough. Even the most expensive, state-of-the-art ride needs to have
something to say
beyond “Look! It’s that movie/those characters you like! (Now go
buy the merch!)” Otherwise, the movie can do a fine job all by
itself and there’s no need for anyone,
on either end of the transaction, to spend the kind of money that
theme parks cost these days.
It’s easy and fun and even satisfying, in a snobbish
sort of way, to expound at length about the failures: those
attractions whose slavish adherence to recreating some aspect of
their source material results in lackluster experiences. I’ve done
that enough on this blog. This post, at least, is about…not the
successes, but a handful of rides that go above and beyond mere
success. These few rides have built on their source material so
well that they have transcended
said material. You don’t need to know the first thing about the
movies that inspired these rides—and indeed, many people don’t—to
appreciate them for what they are.
The “proper” name of the ride that everyone just
calls the Tea Cups tells us that it comes to us courtesy of a
particular sequence in the movie Alice in
Wonderland, and the constant piping of “A
Very Merry Unbirthday (To You)” in the immediate area backs it
up…but who cares.
What movie? They’re the Tea Cups.
Alice has her own dark ride next door, including a more
movie-accurate rendition of the Mad Tea Party scene, which leaves the
twirling Tea Cups to be more-or-less their own thing.
Said own thing is, by the way, possibly the most
instantly recognizable of all Disney rides. Spinning tea cups!
They’ve been referenced on The Simpsons
(but then again, what hasn’t?) and more recently on Steven
Universe, albeit in an altered form:
This picture is really telling, isn’t it? The Mad Tea
Party is so iconic that even in an alternate-history setting where
(as far as we can tell) Disney doesn’t exist, the natural design
motif for a carnival spinner ride is tea cups.
Mr. Toad's Wild Ride
Be
honest: When was the last time you
watched The
Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad?
(The whole thing, not just the Sleepy Hollow part as a Halloween
special?) Not that I can blame you—for most of the 1940s, Walt
Disney Animation was basically spinning its wheels, keeping the
lights on with this and similar compilation or “package” features
but not trying to push the artform anywhere new and interesting.
You're not missing much, in other words, and neither are the 99% of
guests who visit Mr. Toad's Wild Ride without ever having seen its
source material. I doubt if most people even know this ride stems
from a movie rather than being a whimsical park original.
And
even if they do, and have seen it, the ride takes a really unusual
approach. Most attractions based on movies are either loose summaries
of the events depicted on-screen, or are framed as sequels or
side-stories involving the same characters.* Mr. Toad's Wild Ride
does neither—the best term to identify it is deleted
scene...but,
like, a scene that never should have been deleted, because it would
have been the highlight of the entire movie if it had been included.
Seriously,
the movie skips straight from Toad discovering the motorcar to a
newspaper announcing Toad's arrest for grand theft auto, but we can
infer
some kind of chaotic joyride based on his personality. The ride fills
in that gap in glorious first-person perspective, and it comprises a
story in itself. That's how Mr. Toad manages to hang on in Anaheim
despite its source material falling into relative obscurity.**
Splash Mountain
Now,
I know
the vast majority of Disneyland guests haven't seen the movie that
inspired this ride, because...you're not allowed to. Disney has
entirely disowned Song
of the South,
whose well-deserved controversies are incompatible with the company's
total unwillingness to confront its own negatives, and it is not
available for legal sale in North America. (I have seen it...during
its final theatrical re-release of 1986. And never since. At all.)
However,
realizing that taking responsibility for Song
of the South
would get them the stink-eye from just about everyone, has not
stopped Disney from not only building Splash Mountain, but
duplicating it, plus or minus a few details, in Orlando and Tokyo.
And making merch of it. And highlighting it in park anniversary
celebrations. And basically treating it like a theme park original,
to the point where most people simply assume it is one. It probably
helped that, at the time of its 1989 debut, no other ride featuring
animated characters had ever been built outside of Fantasyland, and
with the movie already being discreetly scooted under the rug, there
was little reason for the uninitiated to suspect that the practice
was changing.
In any case, Splash Mountain is definitely the best
example we have of a ride which has completely eclipsed its source
material in success.
Okay, So...?
What can we learn from these examples? Do they establish
enough of a pattern for us to predict what the next attraction to
transcend its source material will be?
Unfortunately...probably
not. This has only happened a scant handful of times in the history
of Disney parks, and with the current insistence that every
ride be based on not just a movie, but a popular movie, with wrecking
crews ready to sweep in and demolish anything the second it begins to
underperform so it can be re-themed or replaced...it's hard to
imagine that any new attraction will ever be permitted to outlive its
inspiration again.
And
that's a pity, because surely that should be the goal
of designing attractions based on movie franchises, shouldn't it? To
improve upon the source and create something so striking in its own
right that it no longer requires that background for its appeal?
At least we Armchair Imagineers can strive for that in
our own projects.
* Or in the case of Finding Nemo Submarine Voyage, both
at the same time.
**
That, and Anaheim fans are much
more sentimental. But we have every right to be.
There's actually a really good fan-restoration of Song of the South on the Internet Archive. I even burned it onto disc to replace by previous copy ripped from a VHS. It's a genuinely entertaining film and worth watching, and the biggest fault of it (by which most of the controversy is undeserved) is that it tries so hard to be inoffensive about a complicated period in American history.
ReplyDeleteOn your actual topic though, I would certainly class Tokyo's 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea and Journey to the Center of the Earth rides in this category. You needn't have seen the movies or even read the books, though it does help. They are in enough of their own self-contained world that as long as you're vaguely familiar with the image of the Nautilus and who Captain Nemo is, you're fine. The Swiss Family Treehouse in WDW has probably outlived the movie itself by a margin. It's also kinda' cool how they, like, have Jack Sparrow a bit in the Pirates of the Caribbean ride but, like, made it a completely different story from the movies that really expands on the world they created.