Monday, January 28, 2019

Armchair Imagineering: Make Mine Marvel

The construction walls have been up at California Adventure for several months at this point, as “a bug's land” is torn out and replaced with...I hesitate to say a Marvel land, since I don't know yet what all will be there. Let's go with Marvel stuff. “a bug's land” is being torn out and replaced with Marvel stuff. WDI is being pretty tight-lipped about the details, but apparently we have an Avengers attraction and a Spider-Man attraction on the way, which in combination with the Guardians Tower of Galactic Terror—Mission: Breaktime! Breakneck! Breakout! amounts to...one heck of a missed opportunity.
There are two problems with IP-mania, as I see it. There's the simple fact of it, the trend of attractions and entire lands based on popular film properties completely overtaking original concepts. I've been over the reasons this is a problem on multiple occasions, so I won't go into it now. The second problem is that IP-based attractions are rarely executed in a way that does justice to either the source material or the larger themes of the park/land where they are placed. We see a lot of “book report” rides, as well as attractions that literally just put character images on otherwise unexceptional rides.* There tends to be too much emphasis on popular characters, rather than on making guests feel like part of an exciting world.
And that's what I'm worried about with the new Marvel stuff. Mission: Brakepads! is already a subpar execution, because they forced it to occupy infrastructure designed for another ride entirely. There's almost certainly a good Guardians of the Galaxy ride out there in the realm of possibility, but deciding to make one where the premise is that the Collector literally took a traveling exhibit of his stuff to the literal California Adventure, simply because there was a convenient tower there to squeeze it into...well, it's not what I would have done. (For the record, this is what I would have done.) A GotG attraction should take advantage of the exotic interplanetary setting and make us feel as if we, like young Peter Quill, have been abducted by aliens and introduced into this hyper-advanced, multi-species society. To the extent that a Guardians of the Galaxy ride needs to focus on its wacky stars, we should at least get to see them guarding the freaking Galaxy, yeah?
Getting back to the upcoming additions...I don't have high hopes. The Avengers and Spider-Man are certainly fun characters, but their “standard” adventures take place in...ordinary cities in the real, modern world. You don't watch an Avengers movie to see what fantastic realm they're going to visit, because they (generally) won't. You do it to see what sort of over-the-top baddie they have to face this time, and how they'll use their over-the-top powers to win the day.
I don't know about you, but I live in an ordinary city in the real, modern world, and it's boring as hell. Which is why I go to theme parks.
The sad irony is that there are several MCU properties that could provide that sense of wonder and participatory adventure that the Avengers and Spider-Man are (probably) not quite up to. Let me throw out some ideas.
(Just as a note before we begin, I haven't actually seen all of the Marvel movies. I should probably get around to it one of these days, but it would be something like 40+ hours of cinema to sit through. So I'm going off what I have seen.)



Wakanda

This is the really big one. The story of King T'challa of Wakanda, AKA the Black Panther, is certainly a compelling one, but the real star of the movie named after him is probably the setting itself: the fictional Sub-Saharan African nation of Wakanda, which successfully resisted colonialism by secretly being way more technologically advanced than the colonizers. Look at this place:


In Disney terms, this is like a wonderful mashup of Adventureland, Tomorrowland, and the World Showcase. Imagine how gratifying it would be to explore such a place, from the dense jungles, to the pastoral regions, to the various levels of the capital city with its bazaar and futuristic skyscrapers, to the eerie vibranium mines.

Paging the designers of Journey to the Center of the Earth...

Wakanda would be a fantastic theme park setting. And speaking of fantasy...


Asgard


Although Thor is one of the core Avengers, his vibe is completely different from the other members of the team. Sure, technically Marvel!Asgard is a distant world somewhere out in space and the Asgardians are aliens who “inspired” Norse mythology, but let's be real. They're gods, and Asgard is a fantasy realm, a bit sleeker and more chromed than a standard fantasy realm, perhaps, but it's got castles and winged horses and a rainbow you can walk on. If Wakanda is the MCU's answer to both Adventureland and Tomorrowland, then Asgard is its answer to Fantasyland.


Micro-verse/Quantum Realm

In case you weren't previously aware, I was and am a fervent fan of the lost and lamented Adventure Thru Inner Space. I'd seen off-handed proposals that it be brought back—in spirit, anyway—as an Ant-Man attraction, but I never thought much of them until I actually got to see Ant-Man for myself. Say what you will about that movie, the climactic sequence where Scott shrinks uncontrollably has some intriguingly freakish visuals. Check it out for yourself. He does, basically, experience the “plot” of Inner Space over the course of a couple minutes, right down to details like a disembodied voice warning of the prospect of eternal shrinking. It would be child's play to frame a scenario like this such that you are doing the super-shrinking instead of merely watching Ant-Man and/or the Wasp do the super-shrinking. Yes, this would be a worthy successor to my favorite ever ride, especially if it included an alarming close encounter with a tardigrade:


And in case it needs to be said, I would want this to be a ride, with proper sets and sculptures, not a motion-simulator or whatever. Adventure Thru Inner Space was already replaced with a motion-simulator once and I wasn't too happy about it, so don't mess me about.


Doctor Strange

This is one of the MCU movies I haven't actually seen (yet), but I gather it features several exotic locales, both in the real world and in various mystical dimensions. I have of course seen images and short clips of the folding cityscape—a terrific challenge for any Imagineering team!


TL;DR version: If Disney must put Marvel stuff in the parks, they should at least tap the most imaginative concepts, not the least.


* Looking at you, Pixar Pier.

6 comments:

  1. Wakanda is definitely the one that screams theme park, and it could have worked well in Animal Kingdom instead of Pandora/Avatar Land, with a more spiritual connection to the animals and stuff. But in general all of these ideas seem much better than what we're getting. And how have I never seen anything about Ant-Man/Adventures Through Inner Space?! That's brilliant I say, brilliant!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The problem is that the ones giving WDI their marching orders think the only thing guests want out of a Disney theme park is *characters.* And theme park attractions are not a good medium for telling a character-driven story, because the main character of your theme park trip is always going to be *you*.

      Delete
  2. You basically hit up all the places that sprang to mind as soon as I read the concept for this particular post.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Superheroes are necessarily a bad idea for a theme park because they are antithetical to good theme park design. As you pointed out, the centre of a theme park attraction's story is supposed to be the guest as you experience this fantastic world. A superhero movie is about watching this other person who is not you do all these amazing things. In a theme park attraction, that translates to you maybe being the terrified normie getting rescued by the hero, if not just passively watching his story. Not exactly compelling stuff.

    Then yeah, compound that with the fact that Marvel movies take place in the modern world, in the modern day... Even their more fantastic settings are ugly and uncompelling. And I can't get over the fact that Wakanda - American's conceptual heir to Liberia - is the opposite of anything that actually happened in real history (Japan resisted Western colonialism through modernization exactly BY opening their borders and hiring Westerners to modernize them, after falling behind exactly BECAUSE of isolationism... But who am I to get in the way of American fantasies of ethno-states with absolute monarchies where black people hoot like gorillas?).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Trust me, if I had my way, the Marvel stuff would be left in the movies where pure third-party spectacle like that belongs. But as long as they're doing it, I feel very strongly that they *could* do something more inspiring and interesting than "Hey, look, it's Iron Man!"

      As for Wakanda...well, I haven't heard of any major complaints on the part of either African-Americans or black Africans about the portrayal of its society. On the whole, they seem ecstatic that someone made an entire superhero movie about people who look like them, *and* it acknowledges the history of colonialism and the plight of black people around the world to this day, without descending into grim realism. Besides, you can wring your hands over our monarchy fantasies just as soon as you take HRM off your money, a'ight? ;)

      Delete
    2. Oh, I get why African-Americans would be cool with it, because it writes them overtop of Africa. What baffles me is Africans being cool about it. But most of the complaints I heard actually came from the anti-SJW sphere, where they were asking "So your anti-colonialist fantasy society where warlords settle politics through violent duels and black people hoot like apes was supposed to prove what, exactly?" It's like everyone was so obsessed with "representation" that they didn't pay attention to how it was self-inflicted racism.

      And it's not the monarchy itself that's the problem, by the by... Here in Canada, we also have these things called "elections" and we are not, at present, anticipating that Prince William and Prince Harry will settle succession with armed combat to the death. It's like Americans don't understand how constitutional monarchy works or something ;)

      Delete